How Policy, Not Technology, Is Driving The Decline of Gas Heating in Australia

How Policy, Not Technology, Is Driving the Decline of Gas Heating in Australia

Australia's transition away from gas heating is often framed as a technological shift driven by the rise of heat pumps, reverse cycle air conditioning and other electric alternatives. Yet this explanation overlooks a more important reality. The technologies capable of replacing gas heating have existed for years and, in many cases, have been widely adopted for decades. What has changed is not only the technology itself, but more importantly the policy environment surrounding its use.

At the same time, falling costs for electric technologies, a wider range of product options, growing consumer awareness of energy efficiency, and increasing concern about environmental impacts have also contributed to the shift. These commercial and social factors have strengthened the case for electrification and made electric alternatives increasingly attractive to households. However, while these developments have supported the transition, policy has become the key mechanism accelerating and shaping its direction.

Across Australia, governments are increasingly employing planning regulations, building standards, electrification incentives and restrictions on new gas connections to reduce reliance on fossil gas in homes. While the pace and intensity of these measures vary between jurisdictions, the cumulative effect is clear: policy is becoming a primary force shaping the future of residential heating. The result is a gradual but accelerating shift toward all electric homes, even in markets where gas heating has historically been deeply entrenched.

Technology Did Not Suddenly Make Gas Obsolete

The argument that gas heating is declining because better technologies emerged fails to explain why gas remained dominant for so long. Heat pumps, reverse cycle air conditioners and electric resistance heating systems have been commercially available in Australia for many years. Reverse cycle air conditioning in particular has been one of the most common forms of residential heating and cooling across large parts of the country. Modern heat pump technology has also reached a level of performance that allows operation in a wide range of climatic conditions.

This is not to suggest that technology and market developments have played no role. Over time, heat pumps and reverse cycle air conditioners have become more efficient, more affordable and available in a wider range of sizes and configurations suitable for different housing types. Consumers today also have greater access to information about running costs, energy efficiency and emissions impacts than in previous decades. These developments have made electric alternatives more attractive and commercially competitive.

However, while commercial and consumer factors have increased the appeal of electrification, they do not fully explain the timing and pace of the current transition, which closely aligns with changes in government policy.

If technology alone determined market outcomes, Australia would likely have transitioned away from gas much earlier. Instead, gas retained a strong position because it was supported by extensive distribution infrastructure, established consumer habits, and decades of investment in gas networks. The recent shift away from gas therefore cannot be explained primarily by technological innovation. Rather, it has been driven to a significant extent by governments changing the rules under which energy choices are made.

Victoria and the ACT Have Become Australia's Electrification Leaders

The strongest evidence that policy is driving the transition can be found in Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory. The ACT became the first Australian jurisdiction to prohibit most new gas connections, preventing new residential and many commercial developments from connecting to the gas network from late 2023. The policy was introduced as part of the territory's broader climate strategy and net zero emissions ambitions.

Victoria followed with restrictions on new residential gas connections from January 2024 and has since incorporated electrification more deeply into its long-term energy planning. Through its Gas Substitution Roadmap, the state has outlined a pathway in which new homes and many new commercial buildings progressively transition to all electric designs. These measures are significant because they do not simply encourage consumers to choose electricity over gas. They actively reshape the structure of future housing developments by removing gas as an available option in many new projects. For new homes in these jurisdictions, the question is increasingly not whether to install gas heating, but whether gas can be installed at all.

This distinction is crucial. Historically, energy transitions have often occurred because consumers voluntarily adopted superior technologies. In Australia's residential heating sector, however, governments are increasingly limiting the circumstances under which consumers can choose gas in the first place. The transition is therefore being shaped less by technological competition and more by regulatory design.

Building Codes Are Quietly Reshaping Heating Choices

While gas connection bans attract the most public attention, some of the most influential changes are occurring through building regulations. The adoption of the National Construction Code's enhanced energy efficiency requirements, including mandatory 7-star NatHERS ratings, has fundamentally changed the way homes are designed. New standards place greater emphasis on thermal performance, insulation, airtightness and whole home energy efficiency.

These requirements naturally favour electric technologies. Modern all electric homes can more easily integrate efficient reverse cycle heating, heat pump hot water systems and rooftop solar generation into a single energy ecosystem. In contrast, gas appliances provide little advantage when compliance is increasingly measured through overall building energy performance.

As a result, building codes are achieving many of the same outcomes as explicit gas restrictions, but through performance-based regulation rather than direct prohibition.

Governments Are Using Incentives Alongside Regulation

Policy support extends beyond bans and building standards. Federal and state governments have increasingly introduced incentives to accelerate household electrification. Programs supporting solar panels, batteries, heat pump hot water systems, efficient appliances and home energy upgrades are reducing the upfront cost of moving away from gas.

The ACT has provided rebates and low interest loans to support electrification, while Victoria has expanded grant programs designed to encourage the adoption of electric technologies. At the federal level, the Household Energy Upgrades Fund has sought to lower financing barriers for energy efficiency investments.

Together, these initiatives create a powerful combination of incentives and regulation. They also interact with broader market trends, including declining costs for many electric appliances, increased competition among manufacturers, greater product availability and growing consumer interest in energy efficient homes. Rather than relying on technological superiority alone to displace gas heating, governments are actively reshaping consumer economics by reducing the cost of electrification and improving access to electric alternatives. In effect, policy is accelerating and amplifying a transition that is also being supported by evolving market conditions, environmental considerations and changing consumer preferences.

Australia Is Not Following a Uniform Path

Australia's transition away from gas is not occurring uniformly across the country, but the jurisdictions driving electrification are also the ones where residential gas use has historically been most entrenched.

Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory have the highest levels of residential gas dependence in Australia. According to Energy Networks Australia, 77.2% of Victorian homes and 79.4% of ACT homes are connected to the gas network, the highest penetration rates nationally. These households also consume significantly more gas than the Australian average, largely because gas is widely used for space heating during winter rather than only for cooking or hot water. Victoria records the highest average residential gas consumption in the country at 46.6 GJ per household annually, while the ACT also sits well above the national average.

This is particularly significant because space heating represents the largest component of household gas demand in colder southern states. Victoria has long been Australia's most gas reliant residential market, supported by an extensive gas distribution network, a cool winter climate, and decades of consumer familiarity with ducted gas heating systems. Government research has previously identified Victoria as having the highest household penetration of mains-connected gas in Australia, reflecting both climatic conditions and the historical abundance of local gas supply.

Against this backdrop, Victoria's prohibition on new residential gas connections and the ACT's ban on new gas network connections are especially consequential. These policies are not being implemented in regions where gas plays only a minor role in household energy consumption; they are being introduced in Australia's most gas-dependent residential markets. As a result, every new all-electric development constructed in these jurisdictions removes a potential future gas customer from the network.

By contrast, New South Wales, Queensland and South Australia have taken a more cautious approach. While these states have adopted stronger building-efficiency standards, they have largely avoided direct restrictions on residential gas use and continue to emphasize energy security and gas supply development.

The contrast highlights how the future of gas heating in Australia is increasingly determined by policy choices rather than technological necessity alone. If technology alone were driving the transition, the pace of change would be relatively similar across jurisdictions. Instead, the states most aggressively pursuing electrification are also those with the greatest historical reliance on residential gas, demonstrating that regulation is emerging as a decisive force shaping the future of home heating.

The differing approaches adopted by Australian states reveal perhaps the strongest evidence that policy, rather than technology alone, is driving the transition. The technologies available to households are largely the same across the country, yet the pace of electrification differs substantially depending on government policy settings.

The Debate Is Increasingly About Policy Rather Than Technology

Supporters of electrification argue that reducing household gas use will lower emissions, improve air quality and eventually reduce energy costs as electricity grids become cleaner. They also point to improvements in heat pump performance, broader product availability, lower equipment costs and increasing consumer awareness of the environmental benefits associated with electrification. Consumer advocacy groups and environmental organisations have therefore called for broader restrictions on new gas connections and stronger support for household electrification.

The gas industry strongly disagrees. Industry groups argue that limiting gas connections reduces consumer choice, risks increasing energy costs and ignores the role gas can play in supporting electricity systems during the transition to renewables. Critics of electrification policies also contend that some states continue to rely heavily on coal-fired electricity, reducing the immediate environmental benefits of switching away from gas.

Notably, both sides largely accept that electric alternatives already exist and are technically capable of replacing gas appliances. The disagreement is not about whether the technology works; it is about the extent to which governments should use policy to accelerate the transition. That distinction is critical. The central debate surrounding gas heating in Australia has evolved from a technological discussion into a political, economic and regulatory one.

Conclusion

Australia's move away from gas heating is best understood as a transition shaped by both policy and market forces, with policy increasingly playing the leading role. Heat pumps, reverse cycle air conditioners and other electric heating solutions have been available for years, yet gas remained a major part of residential energy consumption. More recently, declining technology costs, greater product choice, growing environmental awareness and changing consumer preferences have strengthened the attractiveness of electric alternatives.

However, these factors alone do not fully explain the pace and direction of change. What has most clearly transformed the residential heating landscape is the policy framework surrounding household energy choices. Through gas connection restrictions, stricter building standards, electrification incentives and long-term climate strategies, governments are increasingly steering households toward all-electric living.

Victoria and the ACT have emerged as the clearest examples of this approach, while other states continue to balance electrification goals against energy-security concerns. As a result, the future of gas heating in Australia will likely be shaped by a combination of technological, commercial and policy developments. Nevertheless, current evidence suggests that regulatory decisions are playing the most influential role in determining where, when and how the transition toward electrified home heating occurs.

Author: Aashutosh Chauhan

Source: BRG Research

---

To purchase the detailed reports, go to our online shop:  BRG Heating and Cooling Report

Find out more in our latest edition Australia report:

Australia

For more information, please contact us at:

Email: europe@brggroup.com

Tel: + 44 (0) 20 8832 7860

---